Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Frontiers in public health ; 11, 2023.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2291916

ABSTRACT

Background We estimated the association between the level of restriction in nine different fields of activity and SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility in Spain, from 15 September 2020 to 9 May 2021. Methods A stringency index (0–1) was created for each Spanish province (n = 50) daily. A hierarchical multiplicative model was fitted. The median of coefficients across provinces (95% bootstrap confidence intervals) quantified the effect of increasing one standard deviation in the stringency index over the logarithmic return of the weekly percentage variation of the 7-days SARS-CoV-2 cumulative incidence, lagged 12 days. Results Overall, increasing restrictions reduced SARS-CoV-2 transmission by 22% (RR = 0.78;one-sided 95%CI: 0, 0.82) in 1 week, with highest effects for culture and leisure 14% (0.86;0, 0.98), social distancing 13% (0.87;0, 0.95), indoor restaurants 10% (0.90;0, 0.95) and indoor sports 6% (0.94;0, 0.98). In a reduced model with seven fields, culture and leisure no longer had a significant effect while ceremonies decreased transmission by 5% (0.95;0, 0.96). Models R2 was around 70%. Conclusion Increased restrictions decreased COVID-19 transmission. Limitations include remaining collinearity between fields, and somewhat artificial quantification of qualitative restrictions, so the exact attribution of the effect to specific areas must be done with caution.

2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 2022 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2233431

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Single-dose vaccination was widely recommended in the pre-Omicron era for persons with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The effectiveness of a second vaccine dose in this group in the Omicron era is unknown. METHODS: We linked nationwide population registries in Spain to identify community-dwelling individuals aged 18-64, with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test before single-dose mRNA vaccination (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2). Every day between January 3 and February 6, 2022 we matched 1:1 individuals receiving a second mRNA vaccine-dose and controls on sex, age, province, first dose type and time, month of primary infection and number of previous tests. We then estimated Kaplan-Meier risks of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. We performed a similar analysis in a Delta-dominant period, between July 19 and November 30, 2021. RESULTS: In the Omicron period, estimated effectiveness (95% confidence interval) of a second dose was 62.2% (58.2, 66.4) 7 to 34 days after administration, similar across groups defined by age, sex, type of first vaccine and time since the first dose. Estimated effectiveness was 65.4% (61.1, 69.9) for mRNA-1273 and 52.0% (41.8, 63.1) for BNT162b2. Estimated effectiveness was 78.5% (67.4, 89.9), 66.1% (54.9, 77.5), and 60.2% (55.5, 64.8) when primary infection had occurred in the Delta, Alpha, and pre-Alpha periods, respectively. In the Delta period, the estimated effectiveness of a second dose was 8.8% (-55.3, 81.1). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that, over a month after administration, a second dose of mRNA vaccine increases protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection with the Omicron variant among individuals with single-dose vaccination and previously infected with another variant.

3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(10): 2595-2603, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1486738

ABSTRACT

We conducted a registries-based cohort study of long-term care facility residents >65 years of age offered vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 before March 10, 2021, in Spain. Risk for infection in vaccinated and nonvaccinated persons was compared with risk in the same persons in a period before the vaccination campaign, adjusted by daily-varying incidence and reproduction number. We selected 299,209 persons; 99.0% had >1 dose, 92.6% had 2 doses, and 99.8% of vaccines were Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2). For vaccinated persons with no previous infection, vaccine effectiveness was 81.8% (95% CI 81.0%-82.7%), and 11.6 (95% CI 11.3-11.9) cases were prevented per 10,000 vaccinated/day. In those with previous infection, effectiveness was 56.8% (95% CI 47.1%-67.7%). In nonvaccinated residents with no previous infection, risk decreased by up to 81.4% (95% CI 73.3%-90.3%). Our results confirm vaccine effectiveness in this population and suggest indirect protection in nonvaccinated persons.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cohort Studies , Humans , Long-Term Care , RNA, Messenger , Spain/epidemiology , Vaccination
4.
Euro Surveill ; 26(24)2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1278342

ABSTRACT

Residents in long-term care facilities (LTCF) experienced a large morbidity and mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain and were prioritised for early COVID-19 vaccination. We used the screening method and population-based data sources to obtain estimates of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness for elderly LTCF residents. The estimates were 71% (95% CI: 56-82%), 88% (95% CI: 75-95%), and 97% (95% CI: 92-99%), against SARS-CoV-2 infections (symptomatic and asymptomatic), and COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths, respectively.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Aged , Hospitalization , Humans , Long-Term Care , Pandemics , RNA, Messenger , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL